Trashy's World Rotating Header Image

confidence in parliament

Why I am NOT being hypocritical about this proroguing business…

I thought I would post a short note about why I keep going on about this whole proroguing shitstorm. I have received some comments, both here and on Facebook (from the Resident Love Goddess no less!) that I’m getting my knickers all in a twist about something that is constitutional and that the Grits had no compunctions about when they were in power.

  1. I am essentially a non-partisan political creature. But I AM a bit of a lefty and am most assuredly anti Harper and anti ReformCon. I will – because of my nature – bitch a bit louder about them than the other parties.
  2. if I had had a soapbox like a blog back when the Grits were the Government, I would have yelled at them equally as ferociously for proroguing Parliament for no real reason other than to avoid the world. Although it is a legal practice, it is an abuse of power like no other. How can we expect wanna-be democracies like Afghanistan (OK – I’m stretching it) to take us seriously if our own PM shuts down the doors of democracy whenever he needs to hide from something?
  3. We can and should strive to do better. Past poor actions are no excuse for repeating them.  Just because it was done before does not make it right to do it again. Lawrence Martin puts it well in his article today in the G&M:

“Another line of defence (for those who don’t think that prorogation is such a big deal) is that Mr. Harper isn’t the only proroguer. Liberal PM Jean Chrétien did it too, although none of his closings could match the desperation of Mr. Harper’s prorogation of December, 2008. So what’s the big deal? This is a common Conservative defence refrain. As in, the Liberal record on global warming was terrible too. So what’s the big deal? As in, the Liberals sent disproportionate amounts of stimulus monies to their own ridings too. So what’s the big deal?

One big deal is that we’re supposed to be making progress, moving down the field, not staying on the 30-yard line.

Another is that we have a Prime Minister who thinks he can get away with anything, but who may well find out otherwise.”

And based on the latest polling numbers, maybe Canadians are starting to call him out on this.


Confidence in Parliament – Conference Board Report

The Conference Board of Canada recently released their latest report card on an aspect of Canadian society or its institutions. This time they have focussed on Social performance.

I personally like these reports. The Conference Board is by and large a non-partisan group that truly tries to analyze aspects of Canadiana from an arms-length perspective.  From a guy who makes a living analyzing stuff (I don’t want to be too specific) and looking at how others analyze stuff, I do take what these folks say seriously.

The study is based on the World Values Survey; a project based in Stockholm, Sweden that aims to assess the state of sociocultural, moral, religious and political values of different countries around the world.

I find one of the indicators developed from these results to be of special interest: Confidence in Parliament.  While it is generally acknowledged that public confidence in government institutions has waned in recent years (to put it mildly), some of the conclusions reached by the Board are particularly thought-provoking.

Respondents were asked the question:

“Could you tell me how much confidence you have in parliament: is it a great deal of confidence, quite a lot of confidence, not very much confidence, or none at all?”

Canadians today have less confidence in parliament than they did in the past. The share of respondents reporting a high level of confidence fell from 42 per cent in 1982 to 38 per cent in 2006. That is not a huge drop, but still should be noted.

Overall, Canada is given a “C” grade. Kinda like in elementary school when you went home and said, “well, I didn’t do as bad as Mikey – who got an “F”! Not great but not as bad as Mikey.

In this case, The U.S. is Mikey (Thanks Dubya!).

How have the grade results changed over time?

Trust in Parliament

While Canada’s relative grade improved to a “B” in the current decade, it did so only because recent data are not available for Norway.

As much as I would like to blame the Harperites for this seeming lack of confidence in our top national institution, to do so would be wrong. It is not only the fault of the current government but it is really a phenomenon that began with (IMO) the election of Mulroney in 1984 and has worsened through to the current day.

People are lacking confidence because government have done little to inspire it.  I like to use the “politics of cynicism” to describe the current regime, and I don’t take that back. But nor do I only confine that moniker only to the ReformCons – they have simply perfected it.

It is important that Canadians regain this sense of trust in their elected leaders’ ability to make wise decisions.  As the report points out, the loss of confidence in a this institution may have more serious ramifications.

According to University of Toronto researchers Neil Nevitte and Mebs Kanji, “Occasional citizen dissatisfaction with a particular government is neither unusual nor necessarily problematic.”2 But “more problematical is the possibility that deep and sustained dissatisfaction might corrode regime support. The worry is that dissatisfaction with particular governments might turn into dissatisfaction with the workings of democracy more generally.”3

I have given up on Harper as a source of inspiration as a way to augment our levels of confidence, but please, Mr. Ignatieff or Mr. Layton… please break this pattern and give us something to re-engage us.