<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The cost of maintaining a charade</title>
	<atom:link href="http://trashysworld.ca/2009/11/11/the-cost-of-maintaining-a-charade/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://trashysworld.ca/2009/11/11/the-cost-of-maintaining-a-charade/#utm_source=feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=feed</link>
	<description>Scribbling some perspective on Canada, politics and whatever else crosses my mind...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 20:55:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Evolving Squid</title>
		<link>http://trashysworld.ca/2009/11/11/the-cost-of-maintaining-a-charade/comment-page-1/#comment-5125</link>
		<dc:creator>Evolving Squid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 15:52:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trashysworld.ca/?p=1561#comment-5125</guid>
		<description>One other issue about the GG that is seldom brought up.  The GG is *supposed* to be a non-partisan, but when has that been the case in the last 60 years?  The GG is appointed by the Queen on the recommendation of the prime minister.  Traditionally, the prime minister picks party faithful (Ray Hnatyshyn, for example, was a flaming Tory, Jeanne Sauve was Liberal IIRC, as was Adrienne Clarkson).  Our GG may be non-partisan on paper, but in practice the position is steeped in party politics.

On the strength of that alone we should abolish it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One other issue about the GG that is seldom brought up.  The GG is *supposed* to be a non-partisan, but when has that been the case in the last 60 years?  The GG is appointed by the Queen on the recommendation of the prime minister.  Traditionally, the prime minister picks party faithful (Ray Hnatyshyn, for example, was a flaming Tory, Jeanne Sauve was Liberal IIRC, as was Adrienne Clarkson).  Our GG may be non-partisan on paper, but in practice the position is steeped in party politics.</p>
<p>On the strength of that alone we should abolish it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Evolving Squid</title>
		<link>http://trashysworld.ca/2009/11/11/the-cost-of-maintaining-a-charade/comment-page-1/#comment-5113</link>
		<dc:creator>Evolving Squid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 21:05:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trashysworld.ca/?p=1561#comment-5113</guid>
		<description>re: Olympics

That&#039;s a phenomenal waste of money that serves no useful purpose to Canada whatsoever beyond what amounts to a two-minute national orgasm and proverbial cigarette.  For that matter, with 30 million people in the country and at $100 a pop, you could hire 30 million hookers, give EVERY Canadian that orgasm still save half the money.

re: Senate

Think what you want about it, I feel a bicameral parliament is necessary in a country as geographically diverse as Canada.  Representation by population is good (it would be better if we actually HAD representation by population) but since Canada&#039;s population is concentrated mostly in Ontario, do we really want Torontonians calling all the shots?  The way to get around that is representation by region - hence the Senate.  It serves the same purpose in the USA.

Now, it would be a LOT nicer if those chair warmers were elected...

re: Monarchy

A quaint relic of our past.  We&#039;re long overdue for following in the steps of the former colonists to the south: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ofYmhlclqr4</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>re: Olympics</p>
<p>That&#8217;s a phenomenal waste of money that serves no useful purpose to Canada whatsoever beyond what amounts to a two-minute national orgasm and proverbial cigarette.  For that matter, with 30 million people in the country and at $100 a pop, you could hire 30 million hookers, give EVERY Canadian that orgasm still save half the money.</p>
<p>re: Senate</p>
<p>Think what you want about it, I feel a bicameral parliament is necessary in a country as geographically diverse as Canada.  Representation by population is good (it would be better if we actually HAD representation by population) but since Canada&#8217;s population is concentrated mostly in Ontario, do we really want Torontonians calling all the shots?  The way to get around that is representation by region &#8211; hence the Senate.  It serves the same purpose in the USA.</p>
<p>Now, it would be a LOT nicer if those chair warmers were elected&#8230;</p>
<p>re: Monarchy</p>
<p>A quaint relic of our past.  We&#8217;re long overdue for following in the steps of the former colonists to the south: <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ofYmhlclqr4" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ofYmhlclqr4</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: XUP</title>
		<link>http://trashysworld.ca/2009/11/11/the-cost-of-maintaining-a-charade/comment-page-1/#comment-5106</link>
		<dc:creator>XUP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 15:47:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trashysworld.ca/?p=1561#comment-5106</guid>
		<description>$50 M is a drop in the bucket compared to all the other foolish money being spent in this country. Do I need to mention $6 BILLION for the Olympics?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>$50 M is a drop in the bucket compared to all the other foolish money being spent in this country. Do I need to mention $6 BILLION for the Olympics?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: trashee</title>
		<link>http://trashysworld.ca/2009/11/11/the-cost-of-maintaining-a-charade/comment-page-1/#comment-5074</link>
		<dc:creator>trashee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 19:23:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trashysworld.ca/?p=1561#comment-5074</guid>
		<description>Not again!!!! Yikes!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not again!!!! Yikes!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken</title>
		<link>http://trashysworld.ca/2009/11/11/the-cost-of-maintaining-a-charade/comment-page-1/#comment-5070</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 15:42:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trashysworld.ca/?p=1561#comment-5070</guid>
		<description>Just think... we could gain back $4 per person if we scrapped both the Senate and the Monarchy.

That would be awesome.  Less taxes being paid by everyone, or, as you suggested, plough that money back into the economy by building houses.  The hockey equipment... not so much, though.  People need housing &amp; food... padding &amp; helmets can be bought by the parents.

Anyway... you must be making sense, Trashy - I&#039;m agreeing with you again ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just think&#8230; we could gain back $4 per person if we scrapped both the Senate and the Monarchy.</p>
<p>That would be awesome.  Less taxes being paid by everyone, or, as you suggested, plough that money back into the economy by building houses.  The hockey equipment&#8230; not so much, though.  People need housing &amp; food&#8230; padding &amp; helmets can be bought by the parents.</p>
<p>Anyway&#8230; you must be making sense, Trashy &#8211; I&#8217;m agreeing with you again <img src='http://trashysworld.ca/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
